Compass: Brief Border Wars

Compass: Brief Border Wars

Brief Border Wars is a quadrigame or set of four mini-games on short border conflicts of the 20th and 21st century, using a card-driven system that models the chaotic, stop-and-start nature of these impromptu wars.The four conflicts include:El Salvador vs. Honduras, 1969 (also known as “The Football War”)The Turkish invasion of Cyprus, 1974China vs. Vietnam, 1979Israel vs. Hezbollah, southern Lebanon, 2006The Turkish player in the Cyprus game must establish and exploit from a beachhead; the Chinese player in the Vietnam game must contend with determined guerrillas and a fatal division of effort between two non-communicating fronts; and the Israeli player in the Lebanon game must seek out and destroy the Hezbollah rocket and missile units raining destruction on the homeland.Here is more background on each border war portrayed.The Football WarEl Salvador vs. Honduras, 1969. This is one of history’s shortest wars, clocking in at about 100 hours. People often joke that this was was provoked by one side losing a soccer match: in fact, like most wars, the war was the climax of years of political and economic pressure. The El Salvadoran government reasoned that a war with Honduras would unify the country politically by seeming to avenge the mistreatment of the hundreds of thousands of El Salvadoran immigrants in Honduras and diverting citizens’ attention from other problems. The war, while short, did not provide a solution to anything: about 2,000 people, mostly Honduran civilians, were killed; no land changed hands; infrastructure in both countries was damaged; both countries spent scarce money rebuilding their forces; and economic ties between the two countries were disrupted completely. In the game, both forces are largely similar ? El Salvador has a slightly larger ground force, while Honduras has a bit more airpower ? and both must contend with rugged terrain and poor roads in their efforts to seize or hold Honduran territory.Operation AttilaThe Turkish invasion of Cyprus, 1974. Greeks and Turks have co-existed uneasily on the island of Cyprus since Classical times. In 1974 a coup d’etat by “EOKA-B, a violent organization seeking unity with Greece, overthrew the Cypriot government and was the trigger for the Turkish military to intervene on the island, ostensibly to guarantee the safety of Turkish Cypriots living in small enclaves across the island. The invasion, codenamed Operation ATTILA, saw two distinct bursts of action: first, on 20-23 July when Turkish forces established a beachhead then drove a narrow corridor to the capital of Nicosia; and second, when peace talks and world opinion seemed to be swinging against Turkey, a second invasion on 14 August which ended several days later with Turkish control of about 40% of Cyprus. In the game, the Turkish player has a small number of professional units to seize and dominate as much of the island as possible, opposed by a larger number of Cypriot irregular forces.Third Indochina WarChina vs. Vietnam, 1979. The Chinese government claimed that this brief war, purposely limited in its aims, was launched to “teach Vietnam a lesson”… officially to punish it for its poor treatment of ethnic Chinese in Vietnam, its occupation of the Spratly Islands, and its invasion of Cambodia at the end of 1978. The real incentives behind this first war between two Communist countries were rather more obscure and remain so to this day. The conduct of the war exposed many severe problems of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, which had not fought a war for 30 years. The Army performed very poorly against the determined Vietnamese People’s Army, then one of the largest and most battle-experienced military forces in the world, backed up with a large force of determined local militia and guerrillas.Particularly galling for the Chinese player is having to contend with two widely separated, non-communicating battle fronts.Second Lebanon WarIsrael vs. Hezbollah, southern Lebanon, 2006. The Hezbollah (Party of God) movement is effectively the governing power in southern Lebanon, bordering on the state of Israel. The Second Lebanon War began in July, 2006 after a long series of provocations and retaliations between the two powers: the action begins around July 20, 2006 which marked the beginning of increasingly large incursions by Israeli ground troops after eight days of intense aerial bombardment. The time covered by an entire game may represent up to three weeks, ending in a ceasefire on August 14, 2006. The Israeli player’s main objective is to seek out and destroy the Hezbollah rocket and missile units raining destruction on their territory, while balancing the need to avoid mobilizing too many reserve forces.Each game is small (40 to 50 counters each) and short (one to two hours), using a common set of basic system rules and a deck of special cards to control movement and combat. Each game also features rules additions and variations to reflect the nature of each conflict.These games are ideal short matches to finish off an evening of gaming, or fill a lunch hour. Either way your sense of improvisation will be challenged, and you’ll explore four of the interesting yet obscure small wars of the last 50 years.Product informationComplexity: 4 out of 10Solitaire Suitability: 5 out of 10Time Scale: variable (days to weeks per turn)Map Scale: variable (area movement maps)Unit Scale: variable (battalion to division)Players: 1-2Playing Time: 1-2 hours eachDesigner: Brian TrainComponentsFour maps at 17” by 22”One countersheet of 176 9/16” countersFour Player Aid CardsOne set of 54 cardsOne rulebookTwo 6-sided dice1 Box and Lid set

Compass: Brief Border Wars

‫ 5
ふわふわのもこもこじゃねえーか！玄関でひとりひたすらこれを踏み続けています。誰か遊びに来ないかなあ

平民 3
コスパはとても良くてしっとりしますもう数年使ってますが、新パッケージになってからヘッド部分が外れなくて最後まで使いきれませんロック機能とか要るの？もともとの容器で大容量になれば何も問題なかったのにどうしてこうなった？？？

ﾎﾟﾁｮﾑｷﾝ 4
この容量でガラスのバイアルを買っていましたが、もう次回からはこれです。キャップ式のバイアルだと開けるときがけっこう力が必要で、何個も連続して開閉するとキャップのギザギザで手がいのですが、回して開けるタイプなのでそれもありません。お安いので文句は言えませんが、ガラスなので傷ついたり、ひびが入ることを考慮すると梱包はもう少し会ってもいい気はします。遮光タイプもあると嬉しいです。

まゆみ 2
いつも通ってる自家焙煎のスペシャルティコーヒーを買いに行けず、初めてネットで豆を購入しました。値段は少し高いと感じます。粒の揃い方は、私がいつも買っているマンデリンより少し小ぶり。それほどいい豆ではないのかも。開封時の香りはあるが、淹れてみると、あれ？薄い？フルシティローストとありましたがこんなものか。私はいつもマンデリンはフレンチローストを買っていますので、そちらのボディ感に慣れてしまっているせいか、薄く感じます。膨らみも少なく、焙煎後に時間が経っていると思われます。まぁ、これはこれで、スッキリしていて飲みやすいとも言えますが、多少期待していた香りも期待外れでした。ネットで焙煎後のコーヒーを買うというのはこういう事ですね。勉強になりました。コーヒーとしては飲めなくは無いです。でも、リピートはしません。